The Canadian Government, currently led
by Stephen Harper and the Conservative Party of Canada, has been
accused of “muzzling” scientists who conduct studies for the
federal government, which could violate the Access to Information Act
of 1983. Local Outragee Sandra registered her outrage loudest and
first. “We can't have our scientists running around biting people!
It's a public health issue, not an information one! Tell poindexter
to mask up or ship out!” Running off in a huff, Sandra never did
give a non-literal translation of the headline, and shows a valuable
lesson in the dangers of the media favouring hyperbole over accuracy.
Local science expert Ovaltine
Goose-Shredder was also quick to defend the government's policy of
shutting up scientists. “The world is too big, there is just too
much information, to not just
pick the facts that will back up your per-determined opinions.” he
said early Thursday. Goose-Shredder then used his authority as a
scientist to back up his view, explaining that “[being selective
about facts] is an evolutionary stage on the way to humans becoming
pure beams of light. We're ditching the desire to discriminate
between things and increasing the efficiency of our minds by just
jumping to our conclusions and cherry-picking the facts that back
them up later. It will lead us to a higher plane of existence, and
68% of those surveyed agree.”
With accusations of scientists cowering
at the insistence of Canada's government, Goose-Shredder was
immediately accused of bending his findings at the insistence of
unknown outside actors. Resident expert on Dodgy Scientific
Practices, Ovaltine Goose-Shredder, was quick to distance himself
from any wrongdoing. “I'm not on the federal payroll, and this
Betty character doesn't pay me either. He just follows me around with
a recorder, and I appreciate it.” he responded. Because
Goose-Shredders findings tend to be overwhelmingly impractical and
unpopular, he feels any accusations of improper science are way off
base. “The bright side of not being paid is that you can trust my
findings are 100% free of outside bias of any kind, besides my own
biases that come from being a person and stuff.”
When
asked where he gets the money he needs to live, if his science
doesn't make bank, Goose-Shredder was slow to answer. “Uhhh, I
invented trees, and that's pretty lucrative.” he said. If this is
true, it would mean Goose-Shredder gets royalties on every piece of
lumber sold, leading many to believe it an unlikely source of income,
since royalties on lumber don't exist. “I mean, there's other
things that I make money off of, like if I were allowed to monetize
my re-animating corpses technique, that would make a lot of money.”
Goose-Shredder's appeal to licence his corpse re-animation technique
was recently rejected by the Canadian Government on grounds that
orchestrating a bidding war to have a loved one brought back is a
predatory business practice that a citizenry should never be
subjected to. It took him a while to find a satisfactory answer, “Oh,
every now and then I'll get a few dollars in royalties from my
bestselling self-help book, How the Genius Solved Christmas, which exists. That's
where I get my money.”
Outside
the Coveant Garden Market, Citizen Danny registered some sarcastic
displeasure at the news, saying “I'm really glad to hear Canada's
Government is too lazy to consider inconvenient facts. It's not like
we're expecting them to do well at all, and it bodes well for our
future as a country,” He concluded by turning rabid on the
government, as people who speak on street corners tend to do. “I
never really understood the harm in ideology until I watched [the
Canadian government] blatantly defaulting to their opinion instead of
trying to figure out what the right answer is. I mean, they're
telling scientists to shut up because it could be inconvenient for
them. That's a gutless move, and if you can't face down real
consequences you shouldn't be running a country.” he said, adding,
“Yeah, put that in your pipe and smoke it, government. I just gave
you like, smack tobacco, or something else you smoke that insults
you.”
No comments:
Post a Comment